Journalists must choose truth over patronage

In the media landscape of Bangladesh, partisan journalism is a widely discussed and controversial phenomenon.

This trend, rooted in political allegiance, often creates opportunities for individuals to gain rapid recognition, prestigious positions, and financial benefits. By aligning themselves closely with centers of power, many enjoy influence and prominence within a short period.

However, such gains are often temporary and built on fragile foundations. The core problem of partisan journalism lies in its lack of professional neutrality. Instead of presenting news based on truth and public interest, it frequently serves as a tool to advance specific political agendas. As a result, credibility is undermined, audience trust declines, and, in the long run, the journalist’s personal reputation becomes questionable.

With shifts in political power, this position becomes increasingly precarious. It is often observed that once-influential partisan journalists later find themselves professionally and socially marginalized; some even face legal consequences, including imprisonment.

In contrast, professional journalism—grounded in objectivity, factual accuracy, and ethical standards—ensures sustainable success over time. Although it may not immediately bring high-ranking positions or influence, it gradually builds strong credibility and lasting respect.

A professional journalist, through integrity and dedication, can become a symbol of trust in society, achieving enduring recognition without relying on political patronage.

Therefore, abandoning the lure of short-term gains and embracing professionalism aligns more closely with the true spirit of journalism. This approach is essential not only for individual success but also for safeguarding the overall credibility of the media.

Senior journalist, communication expert and simultaneous interpreter.