Calls for science-based regulation, not panic
The Bangladesh Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Traders Association (BENDSTA) demanded that the Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) also known as e-cigarettes are less harmful than the conventional tobacco products, urging the government to adopt evidence-based policies for the sector.
Citing numerous international certifications, the organization challenged the influencers responsible for spreading misinformation and inciting public panic.
BENDSTA leaders said public policy on ENDS should focus on three priorities: protecting public health, regulating the market and promoting harm reduction.
BENDSTA leaders demanded this at a press conference was held at a city hotel on Saturday night.
The organization pointed out that developed countries such as United States, United Kingdom, France and Italy have opted for regulatory frameworks rather than outright bans on e-cigarettes.
BENDSTA warned that a complete ban in Bangladesh could encourage the proliferation of illicit products and undermine public health safeguards.
BENDSTA president Masud Uz Zaman presided over the conference while General Secretary Rezwan Ahmed and Additional Secretary Tawfique Ahmed were present in the meet.
The association criticised what it described as “misleading campaigns” by certain groups and influencers, alleging that misinformation is creating unnecessary public concern. Leaders challenged critics to engage in open dialogue, offering to present international research and data in a live seminar.
According to BENDSTA, around one million adults in Bangladesh currently use ENDS (vapes). Many of them use these products as an alternative to smoking or to reduce its harm.
While acknowledging that e-cigarettes are not risk-free, BENDSTA cited international health guidance suggesting they may be a less harmful option compared to traditional cigarettes and could support smoking cessation efforts.
